“The S&P 500 is down about 9% from its closing high on January 19th, but there are four sectors that are already down more than 10% since then.”

via: Bespoke

Market points to Bernanke Confirmation

while almost a point lower from last publishing  the Trade Markets now (as of 01.28.10) have a Ben Bernanke Senate confirmation for a second term as Fed Chairman. @ 97cents on the dollar translating into a 97% chance of confirmation.

…with a lower confirmation rate than the markets a subscriber poll done by the Bespoke Investment Group has 88% of those responded believing in a Bernanke Confirmation.

Ben Bernanke to win Senate confirmation for a second term as Fed Chairman
Ben Bernanke to win Senate confirmation for a second term as Fed Chairman
Last Price: 97.0   0.9
You can buy
this at 97.5
You can sell
this at 97.4

“Not only do managers need to become better managers, we also frequently need to be managed better by our employees. I’m always open to new ideas, anything to make me more effective and a better manager and leader, if it makes sense.”

  • Learn how to deliver news
  • Learn your boss’s likes and dislikes
  • Don’t expect your boss to take responsibility for your relationship
  • Help your manager to be successful
  • Don’t rush things

    “Handlers ensure that the celebrity gets from point A to point B. They have the talking points prepared for the celebrity to deliver on camera or in an interview. Acting like a handler makes your boss more efficient and effective”

    Celebrity Handler Tip: Prepping Boss for Meeting

    • 10 minutes prior to meeting, go into his office to remind him of the meeting
    • prep him with a brief summary of important points of the meeting
    • hand him the report or paperwork to be used in the meeting
    • brief him on the report
    • remind him of the desired outcomes from the meeting
    • observe if he wanted me to enter meeting with him or have us enter separately
    • during meeting, watch his cues, then act accordingly to support or take initiative on a topic

    source: SmartLemming.com

    1. Learn how to deliver news: From my perspective, if bad news isn’t framed the right way, in the right context, and with the right tone and urgency, then direct reports can over-dramatize or minimize the news by accident.
    2. Learn your boss’s likes and dislikes: I’ve always made it a point to understand how my bosses work, what they like and don’t like. It’s up to the direct report to adjust to the boss, not the other way around.
    3. Don’t expect your boss to take responsibility for your relationship: Managers are busy. They’re busy doing their jobs just as you’re busy doing yours. They believe in accountability, but won’t necessarily take responsibility for your relationship. Unfortunately, this rests with you. It doesn’t make sense, but it just happens. As managers, we’re too busy in our world and at times must have direct reports take responsibility of the relationship. If you’re having problems, be proactive and speak up. Managers aren’t mind readers. If you’re disappointed in the relationship, how have both of you contributed to create the situation?
    4. Help your manager to be successful: Always help your manager be successful. It makes them look good and it makes you look good, especially if you have a manager that believes in giving credit where credit is due. You don’t want a weak boss. That just makes you’re work life harder.
    5. Don’t rush things: Don’t give trust freely to anyone, especially your boss. They have to earn it and your loyalty. I’ve had bosses who didn’t deserve my trust. I gave it, thinking they had earned it and I was still disappointed and even betrayed. Be careful. Bosses are all too human and have their weaknesses that can hurt you.

    IMN 2010 Spring Investment Series

    Hyatt Regency Huntington Beach, California

    March 1st – 3rd, 2010

    This unique triplet of events is comprised of three separate conferences, each tailor made to best serve your educational, networking and investment interests. Attracting over 400 attendees annually, the Series will bring together the thought leaders of the various disciplines and categories represented to share insights and explore challenges that will better position us all for the opportunities ahead.

    15th Annual Public Funds Summit

    2nd Annual Distressed Investment Summit

    8th Annual California Municipal Finance Conference

    *Click for Full Posting *

    Los Angeles Finance Examiner: Democrats or Republicans; Who is really better for Wall Street?

    Contrary to popular belief and applied assumption Democrats are the historical victors to the claim ‘better for Stock Market’.

    Since 1929, both parties have held the Presidency for approximately 40 years each. According to ‘The New York Times’ and data from ‘Bloomberg’, during this period the consolidated returns for the S&P under Republican rule give a gain of only 0.4%. If you exclude the 30’s crash under Hoover, Republican reign produces a gain of 4.7%, still far below the compounded rate of 8.9% produced by their Democratic counterpart. Over that time a theoretical $10,000 investment in the S&P over Democratic rule would have grown to over $300,000. Under Republican rule the same $10,000 investment would be just over $51,000 today…and putting Hoover back in the mix dwindles your return leaving you with only $11,733.

    Some will point out that there are countless factors in the production of Market Returns and the validity of such data are nominal at best. While this is understood,  no one should discount 40 years of consistent historical data.

    A more technical look is given by Yale and Jeffrey Hirsch in the ‘Stock Trader’s Almanac’ showing a Dow Jones industrial $10k investment compounded during Democratic reign since 1901 would have grown to over $279k after 48 years. The same $10k investment during 56 Republican years would be worth just over $78k. The dull glimmer of Republican reign comes with the appearance of inflation. Adjusted for inflation your 10k investment under the Dem’s would be just over 33k compared to 26k under Republicans. Democrats still fare better but the margin between is greatly reduced.
    The research takes new light when running the same test against GDP. A similar pattern emerges as Democratic Presidents produced a 5.4% GDP growth, contrasted by the Republicans 1.6%. .

    Pedro Santa-Clara and Rossen Valkanov, finance professors at UCLA, decided to further test the above theory using weighted portfolios and broad based indexes.  According to their paper, entitled, “The Presidential Puzzle: Political Cycles and the Stock Market”, published in the October issue of the ‘Journal of Finance’, stock market returns are on average about 5 percent higher when the White House is run by a Democrat than during Republican rule.

    According to the UCLA professors reduction in volatility was also affected positively under Democratic rule. Between 1927-1999, the study shows broad based indexes returning an average of 11% annually over 3-month Treasury’s under Dem’s as opposed to the Republicans 2% average. Controlled portfolios (value (1) & equal weighted (2)) under the UCLA study also validated the theory of Democrats being better for the Stock Market than Republicans. On average, over 72 years, the value-weighted portfolio returned 9% more, and the equal-weighted portfolio 16% more, under Democrats than Republicans.

    The Irony in all of this is that it may be the myth that Republicans are better for the market that causes Democratic linked market gains to be so much greater.
    Investors buy into the Republican-market myth and start off with ‘pain on the brain’ when a Democrat is elected. This results in lower expectations early but euphoric surprise by democratic policies and economic improvement, thus leading to reactive involvement and sustainable market up-trends throughout the course of a term(s).

    The same pattern is also displayed when comparing Democratic vs. Republican controlled Houses.
    Democratic controlled houses also fare better than Republicans, though it should be noted that having one party, either Democrat or Republican, controlling both houses is most favorable to the markets…one house one party is disliked and grafts a history of negative returns

    charted data sourced from bloomberg financial markets

    (1) ‘value-weighted portfolio’ ranks stocks in index according to total market value. (2) ‘equal-weighted portfolio’ ranks all stocks the same.

    Sources: ‘The New York Times’, ‘Bloomberg Financial Market’, & ‘Journal of Finance’

    Contact: WNasserdeen@yahoo.com

    -Walid N. Nasserdeen

    Are we in the midst of an ‘Oil Bubble’?…..this is the question on Wall Street. The definitive answer to this question is far beyond my intelligence.

    While the answer to this question is one to be told by time my opinion on the matter
    is that current oil prices are simply unsustainable.

    That doesn’t mean that oil is going to plunge today or tomorrow. Indeed, it could keep rising for quite some time. After all, you cannot make a rational judgment about when irrational behavior will end.

    But oil prices will come back down. And that will be positive for both the economy and the stock market.

    If you have big profits in your energy stocks, consider paring back. Or at least running your trailing stops closer to better protect your profits.

    If you’re skeptical, take a look at the table below that charts oil alongside the housing and Internet bubbles. The parallels are uncanny.

    Of course, history never repeats itself exactly the same way. We may not be at the exact inflection point.

    {Source Bespoke Investment Group, LLC}

    -Walid N. Nasserdeen

    Los Angeles Finance Examiner: One Economic Indicator Worth Tracking

    Economists and Traders will find that most market indicators relying on forecasts are worthless in our present environment. Unemployment, inflation, consumer confidence, GDP… the data of traditional economic indicators are lagging.

    One of many flaws is that the information is aged by weeks, sometimes even months, by the time reporting is done.

    A better gauge used to monitor Global Markets is the Baltic Dry Index (BDI). The BDI is involved with the cost of shipping major raw materials and tracks brokered price quotes for moving goods from around the world.

    A move up on the index means global trade is increasing and vice versa. Global economic activity ultimately influences the equity markets so heavy moves in the BDI often predict and precede like moves in the equity markets.

    economic principles of supply and demand…

    1.)The supply of cargo ships is limited. It takes years to build a new cargo ship and the high costs prohibit docking during periodic downturns.

    2.) The index tracks the cost of shipping raw materials instead of intermediate or finished goods thus providing a precise measurement on the volume of global trade at its earliest stages.

    3.) The number of ships in operation is not affected by changes in cargo rates…so even the slightest variance in demand results in changes to the index.

    Plus

    • BDI is a real index and devoid of speculation as the index is not tradable.
    • BDI is the only indicator with “real-time” updates…thus increasing its value.
    • BDI is measured in a way that makes manipulation almost impossible.
    • Reliable Data… BDI is not revised on a monthly or quarterly basis.

    If you’re looking for clear indication of a market bottom keep an eye on the BDI for a reversing trend.

    *The following is to be taken as market commentary and general observation. It is in no way to be taken as advice or personal recommendation.

    Contact: WNasserdeen@yahoo.com

    -Walid N. Nasserdeen

    Los Angeles Finance Examiner: Bull/Bear Ratio: A Contrarian Indicator

    The Bull/Bear ratio, a market indicator popular with insiders, is a poll of investment professionals that gauges whether they are bullish, bearish, or neutral on the stock market. The weekly publication by Investor’s Intelligence is considered the most relevant measure of market sentiment as participants have daily dealings within the financial markets.

    The ratio shows the relationship between bullish and bearish advisers and is interpreted to be a contrarian indicator, since extremes in either direction are signals of a reversing market trend.

    High readings of the Bull/Bear Ratio are bearish and low readings are bullish.

    The theory behind using this indicator is that people tend to be bullish after they buy, and bearish when they sell. So if the BB ratio were to register an extreme bullish reading it would be considered a reflection of an unhealthy level of buyers over sellers and would make for a biased and uneven market place, which by contrarian views would be set for a correction.

    A rising trendline means bullish sentiment is outpacing bearish sentiment. The 2.00 area is associated with bullish extremes and market tops, and the 0.60 area with bearish extremes and market bottoms.

    According to Investors Intelligence, “Historically, bulls are 55%-60% when indexes achieve record highs, and those extreme levels of optimism often prove negative. They reflect fully invested positions. High levels of bearishness are usually positive because they most often occur after a major market decline, and reflect that there is plenty of cash on the sidelines.”

    *The following is to be taken as market commentary and general observation. It is in no way to be taken as advice or personal recommendation.

    chart source: Investors Intelligence

    Contact: WNasserdeen@yahoo.com

    -Walid N. Nasserdeen

    -Walid N. Nasserdeen

    LA Personal Finance Examiner: Commercial Real Estate…the next bust?

    In the last year we have bore witness to economic corrections resulting in the folding of a housing market, a credit lockup, a failing financial sector, a recent oil pop, insurance and rating agency scandals, forced redemptions, unseen VIX levels…..etc. etc. etc.

    In light of the Holiday season it seems newest data being watched is that of the retail sector . With knowingly weak, and worsening, consumer spending numbers one would expectedly be led to question the stability of an already weakening Commercial Real Estate Market.

    With dropping sales, and corporate restructuring, many stores, restaurants, cafes, etc. are closing up shop.  This has already been seen on a wide scale, be it from the cafe downsizing announcement by Star-bucks or the bankruptcy filings from such large lot stores as Linens ‘n’ Things.

    The instability of Commercial Real Estate has already begun its downtrend as commercial vacancies rise dramatically leaving some regions with vacancy rates of 15-20%.

    A main danger inherent in Commercial Real Estate is that closing businesses are sometimes  “Anchor” stores; those who are a main pulse and attraction of an individual center. Thus the closing of a store in some cases will seal the fate for an entire shopping complex.

    It is also common for newer retailers to have ‘anchor’ clauses built into the lease stating that if a designated ‘anchor’ store closes then they may choose to terminate their lease as well. This can be an expected multiplier to the down-trending market as it compounds the speed at which retailers vacate the complex

    The National Association of Realtors official CROE report is summarized by saying: “The fundamentals in commercial real estate are feeling the stress of a slowing economy and troubled credit markets. Job growth, particularly in office-using industries, has been declining. Vacancy rates are expected to rise in all sectors due to decreased demand. The financial decline is squeezing credit availability for commercial projects. As a result, transaction activity is down over 50 percent compared with last year.”

    Chart Source:globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com

    Disclosure: Frequent positions in SRS, URE, IGR

    *The following is to be taken as market commentary and general observation. It is in no way to be taken as advice or personal recommendation.

    -Walid N. Nasserdeen

    -Walid N. Nasserdeen

    LA Finance Examiner: ‘Money for Nothing’ – Financial Humor

    “The recent collapse of some of the most venerable names on Wall Street has wreaked havoc on shareholders. On CEO’s….not so much. Hoofy and Boo take a look at how today’s golden parachutes are looking shinier than ever”

    Source: www.minyanville.com

    Posted using ShareThis

    In recent months all walks of investor life , ‘those of the world’ and those outside – looking in, have  been astonished at the latest mess to come forth from a dismantled banking sector.

    The Bernard Madoff Ponzi Scheme: brn1

    • Madoff is a  Wall St. Money Manager who swindled an alleged $50 billion…..the largest Wall St. swindle known to date.
    • Bernie Madoff was a co-founder of Nasdaq, a former Chairman of the NASD , and Founder and owner of Madoff Securities.
    • Investors affected by scheme range from Charities and Universities -t0- Celeberities and fellow Wall Streeters.

    …So what is a Ponzi Scheme?

    • Named after Charles Ponzi. In 1919 Charles conned thousands of New Englanders into investing into a stamp speculation scheme
    • Fraudulently promises to pay a high percentage of return for little risk.
    • The scheme generates returns by paying old investors with the cash flow from new investors.
    • Fraud can only continue if there is a continuios flow of new investor money.

    -Walid N. Nasserdeen

    Related Article: CBS Video: How Much Did Madoff Family Know?

    Below is a visualization depicting the recent Market Value evaporation of our banking institutions.

    4214

    source: Bloomberg

    Market Value, $Bn
    INSTITUTION 07 MV 09 MV %  LOST
    Morgan Stanley 49 13.7 72%
    Credit Agricole 67 20 70%
    Credit Suisse 75 22 71%
    Deutsche Bank 76 12 84%
    Societe Generale 80 19 76%
    Barclays 91 7 92%
    Unicredit 93 24 74%
    Goldman Sachs 100 28 72%
    BNP Paribas 108 26 76%
    Santander 116 53 54%
    UBS 116 29 75%
    RBS 120 6 95%
    HSBC 215 82 62%
    JP Morgan 165 68 59%
    Bank of America 228 33 86%
    Citigroup 255 15 94%
    • Chart illustrates regression-trend across 137 years.
    • 2000 peak was 152% above trend doubling the peak of 1929.
    • Index has been above trend for 17 years.
    • Market price is currently hovering at 5% above the regression line

    sp-composite-real-regression-to-trend-large

    Disclosure: Author frequently holds both long and short positions in the S&P

    *The following is to be taken as market commentary and general observation. It is in no way to be taken as advice or personal recommendation.

    -Walid N. Nasserdeen

    Related Article: ‘Where are the Markets Headed?…You be the Judge’

    -Walid N. Nasserdeen

    Based off S&P data.

    If History is to repeat itself this is what we can expect.

    2891355332_6a4b328e18_o

    Click above picture to view detailed analytic chart demonstrating Market Trends

    *The following is to be taken as market commentary and general observations on historical trends. It is in no way to be taken as advice or personal recommendation.

    -Walid N. Nasserdeen

    WNasserdeen@yahoo.com
    -Walid N. Nasserdeen

    Via Bespoke Group:

    “The New York Times published an article this weekend highlighting that the current 10-year stretch that ended last month was the worst for the S&P 500 in at least the last 82 years.  The Times looked at total returns for the S&P 500, and below we provide a similar analysis of the 10-year rolling price change of the Dow Jones Industrial Average going back to 1910.  As shown, there have only been four other periods where the 10-year return has been negative, and three of the four periods saw returns float around the negative to flat line for quite some time.  While it may have taken ”buy-and-holders” a few years to end up making money if they got in early when the 10-year returns went negative, they did end up making money.”

    Rolling10year

    “When looking at 10-year returns, however, where the market was 10 years ago is just as big of a factor as where it is now.  Ten years ago, the market was just about to hit the peak of the Internet bubble, and once it burst, the 10-year return was destined to take a big hit right about now.”

    “Below we highlight a hypothetical 10-year return chart going out to 2012 if the Dow were to stay right at its current level.  As shown, the return would continue to get negative and drop all the way to -29.49% in January 2010 before finally starting to head higher.  And even if the Dow stayed the same, it would end up turning positive again by late 2011, since the market had fallen so much by late 2001.  If the market gets worse in the next couple of years, the 10-year returns are going to get worse.  But even if the market heads sharply higher from here, the 10-year returns will still be negative to flat until we get past 2010.”

    Estimatedrolling

    The Credit Crisis Explained by Jonathan Jarvis

    via: crisisofcredit.com

    Whether discussing corporate greed, rampant government spending, rising unemployment, regulatory systems, or any of the other recent headlining debates it all leads to the divided discussion on today’s resulting Government involvement.

    …are they doing to much?….to little?

    …should they stay out of the way and let the markets correct themselves or quit with the side stepping politics and take real action before further irreparable damage is done?

    etc. etc. etc.

    These days the debates are endless.

    The most recent discussions to fill our airwaves and coffee shops is that of the new administrations handling of our global economic collapse and the unprecedented actions  in spending, control, and involvement they have taken.

    Stimulus or Bailout?
    …Perception is Everything

    …presented below are illustrations of opposing views on the recent rise in Gov.’t spending

    Stimulus: Illustration of Economic Impact.

    investmentbubbletable

    Bailout: Illustration of  Individual Cost. (data uses family of 2 making 65k annually)

    table

    …whether you view these actions from the side of cost or product (implied impact); the money has been allocated, and will be spent. We can now only monitor and examine the ‘Bang for our Buck’ and look forward with the hope that our monetary sacrifice will serve its intended purpose.

    -Walid N. Nasserdeen

    image sources: recovery.orgright.org

    LA Finance Examiner: What is the State of the Economy?

    via Russell Investments

    Leading indicators — As in January, two of the three leading indicators are outside of the typical range, indicating unstable markets. However, it’s important to note that the three-month trend of all three indicators are pointing towards the typical long-term range. February readings for TED Spread and OAS were slightly higher than in January, suggesting a slight tightening in the credit markets.

    Lagging indicators — All four lagging indicators – including Mortgage Delinquencies, which reached a new high in December – are trending away from the typical range, confirming the challenging economic state. As their name implies, these indicators tend to lag behind the leading indicators.”

    >

    source: Russell Investments

    via : ritholtz.com

    The following is a chart of TARP/Bailout receivers recent lobbying activity:

    Bailout Recipient Lobbied Spent on Lobbying 1Q Bailout Funds Received
    American Express (PDF) Cramdown, Credit Card, Exec Comp $875,000 $3.4 billion
    Bank of America (PDF) Cramdown, Credit Card, Exec Comp $750,000 $52.5 billion
    4.5 billion
    Bank of NY Mellon (PDF)* Credit Card, no response $497,000 $3 billion
    Barclays PLC & US Affiliates (PDF)* Cramdown, Credit Card $1,435,916 $7.0 billion
    Capital One Financial Corp (PDF) Cramdown, Credit Card, Exec Comp $469,000 $3.6 billion
    Citigroup Credit Card, Exec Comp $1,680,000 $50 billion
    Credit Suisse (PDF)* Cramdown $580,000 $.4 billion
    Deutsche Bank* Cramdown $220,000 $6.4 billion
    Discover Financial Services (PDF) Cramdown, Credit Card $257,500 $1.2 billion
    Fifth Third Bancorp (PDF) Cramdown, Credit Card $31,000 $3.4 billion
    GMAC (PDF) Cramdown $410,000 $5 billion
    Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (PDF) Cramdown, Credit Card, Exec Comp $1,105,000 $10 billion
    $12.9 billion
    HSBC GR-Corp (PDF)* Cramdown, Credit Card $1,176,573 $3.3 billion
    ING North America (PDF)* Cramdown $720,000 $1.5 billion
    JP Morgan (PDF) Cramdown, Credit Card, Exec Comp $1,386,000 $25 billion
    Morgan Stanley & Co (PDF) Cramdown, Exec Comp $645,000 $10 billion
    $1 billion
    PNC Bank (PDF) Cramdown, Credit Card $150,000 $7.6 billion
    UBS Americas, Inc (PDF)* Cramdown $70,000 $1.7 bilion
    U.S. Bancorp (PDF) Cramdown, Credit Card, Exec Comp $255,000 $6.6 billion
    Wells Fargo & Company (PDF) Cramdown, Credit Card, Exec Comp $810,000 $25 billion
    TOTAL $13,522,989 $220 billion

    Source:
    Bailout Recipients Spent $13 Million Lobbying Against Consumers in 1Q 2009 – Jane Hamsher

    via : ritholtz.com

    “With consumer confidence at its lowest levels since the sixties, retailers’ registers just aren’t ringing. Join Hoofy and Boo as they take a look at the current state of retail.”

    Source: www.minyanville.com


    1. Long-term rates are going up because traders are getting nervous about future inflation.
    2. Long-term rates are going up because traders are realizing that the world’s big economies will need to issue trillions of dollars of new debt to pay for all their deficit spending…and there’s just not enough dumb money in the world.

    source: TheBusinessInsider

    BRIC Markets (Brazil, Russia, India, China) continue to out pace ‘developed markets’ in 2009

    30-mei-bric

    Source: Bespoke

    Chart depicting the 2/10 slope on the treasury vs SP500

    210-vs-spx

    Source: ritholtz.com

    On Wall St. we  like to spout on about our analytic insights when giving our economic forecasts; we point to correlating markets, ratios, data reports, and more theories than than there are days in the year. Like most things, some of these data points are worth their weight in gold while others aren’t worth the paper they are printed on, but in the end it all comes back to fundamental principals;  the solid bedrock which our Economic Structure is built upon…and in its rawest form, Supply & Demand!

    This principle properly practiced and properly understood can lay a diagnosis and prescription for anything from ailing consumer confidence to product longevity and innovation.

    So the questions I entertain, within the scope of the ‘Supply/Demand’ principle and with regards to a legitimate improvement to our economic system, are focused towards two groups: Financials and Consumers; Those who delegate the money and those who spend/save the money. These two groups are the foundation of all points in our economic cycle and are representative of the Supply & Demand motion that churns our system. But what happens when the two weights which keep a system functioning become out of balance and are each distracted by narrow, short sided, and self benefiting interests. Former IMF chief economist Simon Johnson stated that “from 1973 to 1985, the financial sector never earned more than 16 percent of domestic corporate profits…this decade, it reached 41 percent.”

    For the past decade or so our nation has had a negative savings rate, over extended credit, and a continuous erosion of the middle class, while our financial services sector accounts for almost half of corporate earnings. This is not an appropriate recipe for an Economic system based on progressiveness , innovation, and growth. Our system is completely out of whack as Felix Salmon at Reuters points out stating “financial services companies are meant to be intermediaries, middlemen, and any time that the middleman is taking 41 percent of the total profits in what’s meant to be a highly competitive industry, there’s something very wrong.”

    We must get back to basics. In our nature we have taken a progressive and inclusive economic practice like capitalism and corrupted it into a self serving ideology. We have traded in Progression for Profits and Dreams for Dollars.

    An equilibrium can not be sustained when an entire monetary system is based on quick money, false value, and borrowed assets… and a recovery will not be sustainable until our core problems are exposed and addressed.

    -Walid N. Nasserdeen

    …reference to my September 2008 article

    Where is the Market Headed?…You be the Judge.

    Current comparison on 08-09 vs 01-02 cycles

    2002-redux
    chart courtesy of Gluskin Sheff

    via: ritholtz.com

    *The following is to be taken as market commentary and general observation. It is in no way to be taken as advice or personal recommendation.

    Six Things That Could Still Send the Economy Down the Tubes

    “Some analysts say that the worst is over and the end of the recession is in sight, while others are predicting that we haven’t seen the half of it.”

    click to enlarge graphic

    The image “http://www.creditloan.com/infographics/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/sixthingseconomy.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

    source: CreditLoan’s Infographics

    Charts depicting Personal Savings Rates.

    PSR numbers: Gov’t – calculated vs Cash

    Debt Growth Relative to Economic Growth

    Debt to growth ratio

    via:  ritholtz.com

    “Gold’s move above $1,000 earlier this month grabbed headlines, but its precious metal counterparts have been the real performers this year.”

    GOLD -  14.2%               PLATINUM -  42.5%               SILVER -  51.3%

    Goldplatsil

    via: Bespoke

    trever092209

    picture via: ritzholtz.com

    …”the questions I entertain, within the scope of the ‘Supply/Demand’ principle and with regards to a legitimate improvement to our economic system, are focused towards two groups: Financials and Consumers; Those who delegate the money and those who spend/save the money. These two groups are the foundation of all points in our economic cycle and are representative of the Supply & Demand motion that churns our system. But what happens when the two weights which keep a system functioning become out of balance and are each distracted by”…cont’d @ Recovery! … ?

    Related Article: Recovery! … ?

    “American exports to China soared 341% from 2000 – 2008, according to the US-China Business Council. In fact, China is the third largest U.S. export market, behind Canada and Mexico.”

    California heads as the largest American exporter to China by state.

    14-11-09-01

    source:  Clusterstock via: Ritzholtz.com

    Shangbalti

    Shang1119

    Bdiy09

    via: Bespoke

    Related Article:

    One Economic Indicator Worth Tracking

    Shangbalti

    Shang1119

    Bdiy09

    Our View

    Bespoke Premium

    In The News

    Premium Site

    • Morning Lineup
    • Short Interest
    • Upgrades/Downgrades
    • Sector Snapshot
    • Daily ETF Trends
    • Weekly Review
    • Economic Indicators
    • Trade of the Day
    • Bespoke Stock Scores
    • Daily Market Model
    • Daily Strategy
    • Daily Stock Odds
    • Market Studies

    “With airlines trying to make every dollar count, they’ve come up with some pretty inventive ideas. Join Hoofy and Boo as they take a look at the financial state of the friendly skies.”

    Source: www.minyanville.com

    Graphic showing the world’s most profitable companies.

    6 of the top 10 firms with the highest earnings  are oil companies.

    Most Profitable Companies

    source: billshrink.com via Ritzholtz.com

    Disney-Marvel-Bought-Purchased

    Walt Disney Buys Marvel Entertainment for $4 Billion

    “Walt Disney acquired Marvel Entertainment in a cash and stock deal for approximately $4.24 billion. Marvel shareholders received in aggregate $30 per share in cash and approximately 0.745 Disney stock for each Marvel stock they owned. This values Marvel Entertainment shares at $54.03 each.”

    “Walt Disney has long been dominated by female characters such as ‘Hannah Montana,’ ’Cinderella’ and ‘Snow White,’ and has been struggling to achieve similar success with male characters. The acquisition of Marvel provides Disney with brands and characters targeting young males.”

    source: Zacks.com

    IMN’s Spring Investment Series

    Hyatt Regency Huntington Beach, California

    March 1st – 3rd, 2010

    This unique triplet of events is comprised of three separate conferences, each tailor made to best serve your educational, networking and investment interests. Attracting over 400 attendees annually, the Series will bring together the thought leaders of the various disciplines and categories represented to share insights and explore challenges that will better position us all for the opportunities ahead.

    15th Annual Public Funds Summit

    2nd Annual Distressed Investment Summit

    8th Annual California Municipal Finance Conference

    *visit site for details and registration*

    Facing a budget crisis of massive proportions, along with a volatile national economy and a new Presidential administration, California ’s major economic players will participate at this year’s event.

    Aside from up-to-the-minute budget and economic updates, the agenda will address the latest news about swaps, rating agency battles and water management projects and what is being done to support the state’s massive and complex highway systems.

    As in the past, participants will be drawn from some of the highest levels within California ’s government, from the State House to City Hall

    Session topics include:

    • RETHINKING CALIFORNIA ’S BUDGET PROCESS

    • BUILD AMERICA BONDS: FEDERAL AND STATE PARTNERSHIPS DESIGNED TO BENEFIT INFRASTRUCTURE AND INVESTORS

    • LOCAL GOVERNMENT ROUNDTABLE: SMALL CITIES , BIG ISSUES

    • KEEPING AFLOAT IN THE MIDST OF CALIFORNIA ‘S WATER CRISIS

    • ENERGIZING THE REGION: BRACING BUDGETS AND FINDING ALTERNATIVES TO KEEP THE ENGINE RUNNING AND THE LIGHTS ON

    • MEETING FUNDING LIABILITIES AND RATINGS STANDARDS IN A VOLATILE ECONOMY

    • CALIFORNIA’S FIGHT AGAINST GLOBAL WARMING

    • THE ROLE OF MUNICIPAL FINANCE IN THE AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009

    • DERIVATIVES: IS THERE AN AFTERLIFE?

    • PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS: CONVERTING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INTO INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY

    • ISSUER’S ROUNDTABLE: DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING FINANCIAL STRATEGIES FOR ADJUSTING TO A NEW NORMAL

    • LEGISLATIVE UPDATE: NEW MUNI STANDARDS

    • CALIFORNIA’S REAL ESTATE MARKET: WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?

    • DOMESTIC EMERGING MARKETS: DERIVING RETURNS WHILE

    • REBUILDING COMMUNITIES IN A DISTRESSED ENVIRONMENT

    Featured Speakers:

    Matthew Rutherford, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Federal Finance,  U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Matthew Rutherford

    Deputy Assistant Secretary, Federal Finance, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


    Henry Cisneros, Former Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Executive Chairman, CITYVIEW Henry Cisneros

    Former Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Executive Chairman, CITYVIEW


    Bill Lockyer, Treasurer, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Bill Lockyer

    Treasurer, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

    Next Page »